Climate Finance in G20 : Where Are We Now?

Mar, 3 2014

Penulis :

Currently, the G20 priority agenda covers sectoral issues that support development, but apparently, climate change has been the one that is left behind. Climate finance, as a result, has not yet become a priority on the agenda.

A G20 report ( in 2011 identified several sources of finance that can be allocated for climate change mitigation and adaptation. One of the issue that was discussed within G20 that relates to climate change is the phasing out of fossil fuel subsidies. The issue to phase out  inefficient fuel subsidies have been discussed and agreed among the country leaders since the G20 meeting in Pittsburg 2009; yet, there has been no concrete implementation of this commitment.

The February 2014 meeting for finance and central bankers meeting  resulted in the agreement  ( for countries to target  2% economic growth through many approaches. The growth should be achieved through increasing the investment, lift employment and participation, enhance trade and promote competition, in addition to macroeconomic policies.

From my perspective, achieving the above growth should also consider the limitation of using inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies and shifting it to finance renewable energy and implementation of energy efficiency measures. Shifting or reforming the subsidy from financing the fossil-fuel driven industry to investment for renewable energy and/or energy efficiency will both reduce  greenhouse gases emissions and at the same time generating opportunity to raise climate finance from existing recources.

G20 countries should be able to answer the following questions:

  1. What should be done by the G20 countries to phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies and shift it to finance renewable energy and energy efficiency development?
  2. What should be the contribution of the G20 countries to support the development of developing countries to which they are willing to cooperate with (ASEAN, East Asia Summit, Africa countries) to support them in coping with the impact of climate change, in terms of financial provision?
  3. How to ensure that the G20 countries will implement their agreement and/or following up their findings in terms of climate finance (such as the AGF – the Advisory Group on Climate Financing – report ), that it should not be only be a simple document, but it could be an action plan that could be implemented by the G20 countries.

If you have something in mind on how to answer the above questions, share your thoughts by clicking . We will collect your ideas and compile it to be submitted as inputs for G20 meetings on climate finance.

Artikel Terkait
Dec, 5 2012

  Diskusi tentang equity kembali bergulir di forum Ad hoc Working Group on Durban Platform on Enhanced Action (ADP) di Doha. Sayangnya, equity lebih banyak

Nov, 18 2013

Di tengah-tengah berjalannya perundingan mengenai perubahan iklim di Warsawa, Polandia, pemerintah Polandia juga mengadakan International Coal Summit di Warsawa. Tentu saja hal ini mengundang kontroversi

Dec, 16 2014

Terlepas dari banyak kekecewaan yang dituai oleh Negara-negara Pihak sehubungan dengan hasil Lima, terutama untuk masalah pendanaan, namun, COP20 tetap memunculkan harapan baru terkait dengan

Feb, 23 2012

Oleh: Morentalisa Selama beberapa dekade perkembangan industri ekstraktif (minyak, gas dan tambang), industri ini dikenal sebagai industri yang bersifat sangat tertutup dan cenderung elitis. Tidak

0 Comment

Tinggalkan Komentar

Your email address will not be published, Required fields are marked

Support Online
Support Online